Saturday 4 November 2023

GK Chesteron - A forgotten hero of journalism?

G K Chesterton was once one of the most famous writers in Britain,  if not the world. He made several highly popular tours of the United States of America. 

He was a journalist who wrote hundreds of articles -many of them never published in anthology form, so copious was his output. But all of them seemed to be of a high standard. 

He also wrote a number of books, the best remembered being the fantasy novel, "The Man Who Was Thursday". 

But he has long faded into an undeserved obscurity, even though his Father Brown stories about a Catholic priest who is an amateur detective, are still being broadcast on TV. 

He wrote on a wide variety of topics. From what to do on a wet day to the advent of fads and cults and from new religions to the dangers of civil servants and "experts" from charities who seem more interested in following their own rules than looking after the people whose interests they were supposed to look after. No change there, then? 

The following quotes from his writings show that Chesterton still has much to say to the modern world. 

"There is a road from the eye to the heart that does not go through the intellect" The Defendant, 1901 

"Literature is a luxury; fiction is a necessity." The Defendant, 1901 

"Happiness is a mystery like religion, and should never be rationalised." Heretics, 1905 

"If a man wishes to know the origin of human society, to know what society, philosophically speaking, really is, let him not go into the British Museum; let him go into society." Heretics 1905 

"The artistic temperament is a disease that afflicts amateurs." Heretics, 1905 

"The word 'orthodoxy' not only no longer means being right; it practically means being wrong." Heretics, 1905 

"Truth must necessarily be stranger than fiction; for fiction is the creation of the human mind and therefore congenial to it." The Club of Queer Trades, 1905 

"We talk of wild animals; but man is the only wild animal. It is man that has broken out. All other animals are tame animals; following the rugged respectability of the tribe or type." Orthodoxy, 1909 

"The men who really believe in themselves are all in lunatic asylums." Orthodoxy 1909 

"What is bad in the candid friend is simply that he is not candid. He is keeping something back - his own gloomy pleasure in saying unpleasant things." Orthodoxy, 1909 

"Virtue is not the absence of vice or the avoidance of moral dangers; virtue is a vivid and separate thing, like pain or a particular smell." Tremendous Trifles, 1909 

"To be clever enough to get all that money, one must be stupid enough to want it." The Innocence of Father Brown 1911 

Those of you who would like to know more about G K Chesterton might be interested in these resources:-

https://www.chesterton.org/local-societies 

https://www.chesterton.org 

https://www.catholicgkchestertonsociety.co.uk

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._K._Chesterton

(Image courtesy of FreeImages.com)

How to write drama reviews

Writing drama reviews need not be as hard as one might imagine. At it's most basic all you need is a note book, several pens and either a seat near a theatre safety light or a small pocket torch, perhaps suitably shielded so as not to cause interference with the enjoyment of theatregoers. 

And you need is a love of drama and an understanding of it. The understanding of drama can be learned. 

One of the cardinal rules of reviewing a play is to never give away the ending of a play or too much of the plot. -It's amazing how many supposedly experienced journalists can get this basic point wrong. 

When writing a review, resist the urge to be clever. People read drama reviews to see what's on at the theatre, not to see how witty the reviewer thinks they can be. -Sadly, someone who thinks they are  a wit is usually only half-right! 

Puns, witticisms and jokes based on the name of the play, characters, or cast members are the hallmark of a very poor reviewer. No matter who they are, or how much they are paid. 

When going to the theatre to review a play ensure you arrive as early as possible. Ensure you get an up-to-date cast list. Familiarise yourself with the programme and programme notes before you start to review the play. 

Leave any preconceptions at home. If you have seen the play before, or seen the cast members in a different play or the same play (this could happen if you review plays in drama festivals) remember that you have never seen this performance before! It's fresh and new and so must you be! 

Never make the mistake of thinking you can get away with writing a review without having seen the play, by just looking at the cast list and guessing how it went. 

The careers of many journalists -even some experienced ones- have foundered on this particular rock. Casts can be changed at a few minutes notice, plays cancelled, etc. 

When you are writing your review (or "crit" which is short for criticism, as some people call them) never go over the top with criticism. 

If you think someone didn't learn their lines, draw attention to the fact. -After all, that's one of the reasons you are reviewing the play! 

But be careful not to use insulting terms. If you accuse an actor of not bothering to learn his or her lines and it turns out that they had stepped in to the role with only two days' notice, who would look stupid? Them or you? 

There are ways around this. You will -with experience- learn how to say exactly what you mean, but in ways that won't offend. And in ways that cast and backstage crew will find genuinely helpful. 

One newspaper I worked for had a policy of not writing "bad" reviews of amateur productions, because they didn't want to hurt anyone's feelings! -I kid you not! 

Having been involved in amateur dramatics as an actor and technician I can assure you that the opposite is more often the truth. As long as the reviewer proves that he or she knows what they are talking about and isn't just trying to be clever at their expense, they will usually accept a review with some negative comments in it. After all, they don't want to put on bad performances. 

A review needs to be short and to the point. -This is another reason why it doesn't pay to be too witty or verbose.. 

How can you get hands-on experience? Talk with local drama groups. Ask them to supply you with complimentary tickets so that you can review their plays. 

Read the drama reviews in the local and national press. Are they good? Could you have done better? 

Play sub-editor. Try re-writing them to tighten them up. 

Then submit reviews of local drama to your local press.  If your local paper doesn't have drama reviews -gently suggest that perhaps it's time they started? 

(Image courtesy of MorningbirdPhoto from Pixabay)

Whoops! Some "pressing" errors! Mistakes in the press

Just a few examples of blunders and weirdness from the press.

Errors in the press. Some are as a result of errors by a journalist, some by typesetters and some are genuine news stories or adverts that seems to defy all logic or reason. 

Here are just ten samples from my collection:- 

"From the South China Morning Post 

 IN THE COURTS 

 Facts hold up case." 

(Don't they always?) 


"Nottingham Evening Post 

 Violence - Judge hits Out" 

(Ouch! Sub-editors 1 Journalist 0) 


"The Luton News 

Wanted. Stage staff. Sex immaterial, but an advantage." 

(Yes, I'd imagine it would be!) 


"Leamington Spa Courier 

 Bus moans: MP to see for himself." 

A prime example of the sub-editors art. And shows a fine ability to render even the most innocuous sentence into a surreal event in a parallel universe. 


The following is a genuine advert from the Daily News, Dar es Salaam 

"GOATS! 

 On a special occasion, 

 Something special counts. 

 -A goat for a cake on your wedding counts. 

 -For a bite during parties, a goat counts. 

  -Enjoy with your family to slaughter a goat on a weekend. 

  GET ONE TODAY. 

 The Tanzanian Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Building, Morogroo Road, Dar es Salaam." 

(This is a genuine advert! How on earth could the building owned by the Tanzanian Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals sell goats for slaughter?) 


A report in the British Daily Express pointed out the following stunning information: By 1980 there would be a million alcoholics. "And most of them would be men and women." 

(This is an awesome sentence. Just awesome. "Most of them would be men and women." Well, I'd guess they would be, at that.) 


And there was an advert for a knife-thrower's assistant which said: "Unexpected vacancy." (I really do not think that a comment is required, here!) 


"Kent and Sussex Courier 

 Police found drunk in shop window." 

(Were some police officers found drunk in a shop window? Or did some police officers find a man who was drunk, in a shop window? That pesky sub-editor again!) 


"The Spectator 

  It does not help that the book is full if misprints and spelling mistakes." 

(The only word to fit the above item is "hubris", I think.) 


Unknown paper 

 "Hell to pay if vicars were to go on strike." 

(Was this a sub-editors feeble attempt at humour? We'll probably never know!)